From dog races to bullfighting and circus shows — animals have historically been used in sports and for entertainment. But critical voices to curb or even ban their use are getting louder.
Though humans have used animals as sources of sporting entertainment for millennia, ethical concerns and questions about welfare are becoming increasingly vocal.
“In Australia, we have a big horse race every year, the Melbourne Cup. And that’s becoming increasingly controversial because we can see horses fall and break their legs and die in that race almost every year,” said Heather Browning, a lecturer in philosophy at the UK’s University of Southampton who focuses on animal welfare, ethics, and consciousness.
With stakes often high, some animals are given drugs or whipped into delivering the desired performance.
“There’s a lot of money on the line, so obviously you have unscrupulous trainers or veterinarians who are willing to push these horses to the absolute limit,” said Joanna Grossman, a senior policy advisor at the Animal Welfare Institute in the United States.
Animals can feel pain
For a long time, the degree to which animals experience pain, suffering and fear was hotly contested, which Grossman says made it all the “easier to exploit them.”
But recent years have seen the emergence of an interdisciplinary community of animal sentience researchers that studies animals’ capacity to experience pleasure or suffering.
“Everyone is very, very confident that mammals — dogs, horses, primates — feel pain just the way we humans do. They have brains that are structurally very, very similar to ours,” Browning said, adding that there’s now broad consensus that birds and fish are equally sentient beings.
Increasing bans on greyhound racing
Some popular sporting events based on the performance of animals have already been banned in countries across the world.
Dog racing, in which greyhounds chase a mechanical lure around a track, is among them. At times, this sport drew more spectators than its more prominent rival, horse racing and was mainstream entertainment for decades.
However, it has recently come under scrutiny for confining the animals to lonely lives in kennels, for its brutal training methods and for what happens to the dogs once they are no longer needed on the track.
“A lot of the training methods used to ensure the animals are performing are quite harsh and punishment-based. So what’s happening to them when they’re not on display — that’s the main concern for their welfare,” Browning said.
Dog racing remains legal in only 10 countries worldwide, four of which are in the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland).
Wild animal shows are becoming less popular
Traditional circus acts involving animals, such as elephants, tigers, giraffes and lions, have also faced increasing backlash. The same goes for the use of dolphins and other marine animals in sealife shows.
“They are outright being abused to get them to behave according to what the trainer wants them to do because that’s not naturally something that a wild, exotic animal who should be out roaming free is going to be inclined to do on their own,” Grossmann said. “So you might have to just kind of literally beat them into submission to get them to do that.”
The use of wild animals in circuses has been banned in many countries across the world, including Bolivia, Costa Rica, India and Iran. However, it’s still legal in many European countries.
In 2021, one million EU citizens called for a bloc-wide ban on the use of wildlife in big-top shows after research showed that almost 90% of animals saved from European circuses suffered from behavioral problems, self-injury or physical problems as a result of practices such as declawing.
France, the EU country that has at times held the highest number of wild animals for use in circuses, decided to ban them from the ring as of 2028.
In Germany, however, it remains legal to show wild animals at the circus. This is despite polls suggesting 75% of Germans are against it, alongside a rising awareness of how lions, bears and primates are transported.
“It just doesn’t seem like there’s any possible way to house an animal in a sufficiently large and complex enclosure when you’re trying to move it around all the time,” said Browning.
‘Blood sports have no future’
Blood sports such as bullfighting, in which a bull and a matador face off in a public spectacle, have also become ever more controversial.
Approximately 250,000 bulls are killed in organized fights annually, according to the European animal welfare organization Humane Society International (HSI).
Grossman describes it as a “very violent and very cruel sport” rooted in brutality. “If the goal is just to terrorize a poor animal and then ultimately end up killing them, to me, that stands out as a very blatant example of needless and unjustified suffering.”
“But the good news is that we have seen a move in various jurisdictions and countries to ban forms of blood sports,” she added.
Bullfighting has already been outlawed in many countries where it used to be popular, including Argentina, Canada, Cuba, Italy and the United Kingdom. Nowadays, it is only legal in eight countries worldwide, three of which are in Europe: Spain, France and Portugal.
And though Grossman says there will likely always be people who think blood sports should remain legal, she has also seen “much more concern among the public for animal welfare.”
Is there a way to still have animals in sports in a responsible way?
“How the animals are housed and cared for plays a huge part. The majority of their life is spent not doing the sport. And many are simply killed when they’re no longer useful. That’s why regulations around that are vital,” Browning said.
But it’s not enough to just create these laws. “We need to make sure that there are enough inspectors, that they’re doing their jobs on a regular basis,” she added.
Social media has also helped in showing people what’s happening behind closed doors, says Grossmann.
“It has made the public see footage of what is really going on,” she said. Browning agrees, adding that seeing abuse could lead people to refuse to pay for something where animal cruelty is happening.
Source: Dw
