French court upholds ban on controversial neonicotinoids amid agricultural protests

French court upholds ban on controversial neonicotinoids amid agricultural protests

1 hour ago

French Constitutional Court Invalidates Key Provisions of Controversial Pesticide Law

The French Constitutional Court has ruled that provisions of the controversial pesticide legislation, known as the “Loi Duplomb,” do not comply with constitutional guidelines, emphasizing that neonicotinoids—such as acetamiprid—can only be used in exceptional circumstances and for a limited duration on specific crops. The court found that these conditions were not adhered to in the law’s current formulation, reports 24brussels.

Introduced following extensive farmer protests in 2024, the law had gained parliamentary approval and received backing from the government and significant farming lobbies. However, it faced staunch opposition from left-wing parties, which raised alarms about its potential negative effects on biodiversity.

In recent developments, more than 2 million French citizens have signed a petition initiated by a 23-year-old student calling for the repeal of the law, thereby increasing pressure on the government. The petition reflects a growing public concern over the environmental implications of pesticides.

The law has intensified the divide within French society, pitting powerful agricultural lobbies against environmentally conscious citizens worried about the repercussions of pesticides on pollinators and public health. Critics have implored French President Emmanuel Macron to reconsider endorsing the legislation.

In response to the court’s decision, Macron’s office indicated that the president acknowledges the ruling and will implement the revised version of the Duplomb law in line with constitutional guidelines. Consequently, the ban on acetamiprid will remain effective.

Left-wing opposition representatives rejoiced at the court’s ruling, while the agriculture ministry is anticipated to provide a statement later in the day. In contrast, the farming lobby FNSEA condemned the court’s decision. FNSEA President Arnaud Rousseau expressed concerns that the ruling signifies a “pure and simple abandonment” of particular sectors of French agriculture, particularly as the nation grapples with increasing reliance on imports, which detracts from both social and environmental priorities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Don't Miss

EU report highlights shortfall in humanitarian aid to Gaza, discrepancies with Israeli data

EU report highlights shortfall in humanitarian aid to Gaza, discrepancies with Israeli data

Fuel Supply in Gaza Inadequate for Humanitarian Operations, Reports Show The volume
Belgium's visa policy has severe implications for those in Gaza, say lawyers

Belgium’s visa policy has severe implications for those in Gaza, say lawyers

U.S.-Russia Relations Present Risks to Export Trade, Warns Lobbyist The export trade,